The details of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) permitting process are getting a close examination this week in Harrisburg. The DEP got a lot of attention recently when it decided to stop processing Sunoco’s environmental permits (including those for the Dragonpipe—the Mariner East pipeline system) because of non-compliance. But the details and importance of the permitting process haven’t gotten much recognition lately. Through its permits, the DEP is responsible for assuring that the “waters of the Commonwealth” are protected.
Ellen and Stephen Gerhart, whose property Sunoco took by eminent domain after a long fight, have filed a complaint with the Environmental Hearing Board (EHB) alleging improper DEP permitting of construction through a wetland on their property. The EHB is the organization to which DEP decisions are appealed if they are thought to be incorrect.
The hearing began yesterday (February 20, 2019) and will continue for two or three additional days. On the first day, the Gerhart’s case was laid out, based on a short appearance by Ellen Gerhart and a thorough review of the facts in the case by her expert witness, James Schmid, who is a wetlands authority.
The key issues in the case are: what is the official definition of a wetland for permitting purposes (the Army Corps of Engineers defines this), what determines whether a wetland is “forested” or not, how are wetland boundaries determined, did Sunoco’s contractors fail to identify forested wetlands and fail to correctly determine the extent of wetlands more generally, and did the DEP issue permits despite obvious evidence of errors in wetland definition and boundaries.
The Gerharts appear to have a strong case. If they prevail, the outcome could involve better remediation of the site, compensation or fines, and the requirement for the DEP to improve its permitting processes. Sunoco would once again come out looking like a bad actor, twisting the rules to its own advantage. Those are all important outcomes, but do not look to this particular case to result in the shutdown of the Dragonpipe. And regardless of who wins the EHB case, there is a good possibility of an appeal, so the ultimate resolution is likely to take a while.
About 20 supporters of the Gerharts, including Ellen’s daughter, showed up for the hearing. Together with a phalanx of Sunoco lawyers and a number of DEP representatives, they filled the small hearing room to capacity.
Thank you so much for this post and all of your earlier posts as well. Your blog happens to be the main source of all the ME2 updates I read. It has been quite a distressing learning journey but very needed. I hope the Gerharts win as I remember watching their story sometime ago through the Uwchlan Township Coalition website. I admired howthey stood their ground! Is there a way to keep track of any upcoming hearings? If I could have, I would have gone to the hearing in support of the Gerhart’s.
Thank you again, Mary
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 2:20 PM Dragonpipe Diary wrote:
> galex49 posted: “The details of the Department of Environmental Protection > (DEP) permitting process are getting a close examination this week in > Harrisburg. The DEP got a lot of attention recently when it decided to stop > processing Sunoco’s environmental permits (includin” >
LikeLike
Thank you for the kind words, Mary.
For the immediate future, most of the hearings relating to the Dragonpipe will be before the Public Utility Commission. Only one of them is currently scheduled (Wilmer Baker’s hearing on March 28 in Harrisburg), but I’ll do my best to post the dates as they become available. Keep checking back at https://dragonpipediary.com/annotated-listing-of-pipeline-related-cases-before-the-puc/. I will also mention them in blog posts, so you may want to sign up to get notification of all posts by email (which you can do from any blog page).
LikeLike
We’re you in the hearing room? And the next two days?
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 1:20 PM Dragonpipe Diary wrote:
> galex49 posted: “The details of the Department of Environmental Protection > (DEP) permitting process are getting a close examination this week in > Harrisburg. The DEP got a lot of attention recently when it decided to stop > processing Sunoco’s environmental permits (includin” >
LikeLike
Yes, I was there. But I can’t afford the time for the trip out to Harrisburg (2 hours each way) for the rest of the hearing.
LikeLike
It would be very useful if you could identify the lawyers working for Sunoco, by name and firm if possible. Thank you.
LikeLike
To get a list of attorneys on the case, you can go to the DEP docket search page at: http://ehb.courtapps.com/public/commonsearch_ehb.php
and search for case 2017013. The attorneys are listed there. Sunoco has six attorneys on this case: two from Post & Schell, P.C., and four from Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox LLP.
LikeLike